Ted Frank writes here that

To date, there is no evidence that the spam was connected to Ameritrade, or that a breach of Ameritrade data security that released home addresses for its customers has resulted in any harm, despite Ameritrade seeding databases with dummy spam-catcher e-mail addresses, and multiple analyses of whether identity theft had occurred.

Wow.  Is this guy actually too stupid to be allowed near a computer keyboard, or is he just trying to spin things in the usual AEI way?  This guy has an impressive reality distortion field around his head.  This is totally contradicted by the complaint, and supported by the evidence filed in the case. There is, the complaint explains, ironclad proof from a large number of computer gurus that the spam was connected to TD Ameritrade, namely that the spam was sent to unique email addresses stolen from a core TD Ameritrade customer database.  A database which TD Ameritrade has admitted got broken into and plundered.  That it admitted contained the names, addresses, social security numbers, dates of birth, and account balances of its 6.3 million customers.  But Ted Frank’s ostrich-style thinking is like that of TD Ameritrade a firm that is claiming that it’s plausible that crooks breaking into the equivalent of Fort Knox would leave the gold (the Social Security Numbers) and just take the silver (the email addresses).  That a rash of Identity Theft that began right after the breach was discovered does not constitute evidence connecting the two.

STOP znw-5#%—NO CARRIER
ABORT: -PEBCAK